The Bill of Rights: What the Founders Were Afraid Of
The first ten amendments were not added to the Constitution because the Founders loved rights. They were added because the Founders feared power — and they had good reasons, drawn from their own experience, to fear it.
The Bill of Rights was not in the original Constitution. The Framers at Philadelphia in 1787 did not include one — not because they didn't care about rights, but because many of them thought a bill of rights was unnecessary and potentially dangerous. Hamilton argued in Federalist No. 84 that enumerating rights implied that the government had powers it didn't have.
The Anti-Federalists disagreed. They had lived through British rule. They had seen what governments did when they were not restrained. They demanded a bill of rights as the price of ratification — and they got one. The first ten amendments were ratified in 1791.
What the amendments reveal, when read carefully, is a map of the Founders' fears. They feared soldiers quartered in private homes (Third Amendment) because that had happened under British rule. They feared general warrants (Fourth Amendment) because those had been used to harass colonial printers. They feared the loss of jury trial (Sixth and Seventh Amendments) because juries were the citizen's last check on government power.
To understand the Bill of Rights, you have to understand what the Founders were afraid of. And to understand that, you have to read the history they lived through. The amendments are not abstract principles. They are responses to specific abuses — and they remain relevant because those abuses are always possible.
Continue Reading